In this fun, 3-min performance from the World Science Festival, musician Bobby McFerrin uses the pentatonic scale to reveal one surprising result of the way our brains are wired.
Midmer-Losh Pipe Organ
“This is the console of the worlds lagest and loudest musical instrument, the Midmer – Losh pipe organ.
It has over 1,200 stop tabs and over 33,000 pipes.
It took 4 years to build (1929-1932) at a cost of $500,000 at the height of the Great Depression. [...]”
Official website / Flickr. [via andreaxmas.com]

The Pleasurize Music Foundation launched a wide-ranging initiative for ending the “Loudness War”
In January 2009, The Pleasurize Music Foundation launched a wide-ranging initiative for ending the “Loudness War” being waged by successive music releases. This initiative aims to introduce a dynamic standard through several phases.
TT Dynamic Range Meter (free download) makes it possible to provide releases with a whole-number dynamic value to be printed on the recording medium as a logo, giving consumers an immediate means of knowing the dynamic quality of a recording.
An online database is planned for furnishing information on music already released with the standard.
Founder and conceptual father Friedemann Tischmeyer on the functions and aims of the Foundation:
“We believe that music – as an artistic means of expression – should transmit emotions. Nowadays, this is possible only to a limited degree because dynamics — a fundamental part of expressivity — are often missing. On a subconscious level, emotions are expressed by musicians emphasized with a feeling of urgency or insistence. Modern mainstream music sounds like a flatly pressed board being rammed through loudspeakers and uses the greatest possible amount of intrusiveness just as advertising does – as a means of constantly trying to get the listener’s attention. In this way, a fundamental aspect of music is lost. Countless consumers who are old enough to remember more dynamic music are not even aware of what is wrong with releases nowadays. The experience of buying music has become frustrating. Who wants to spend money for music that just beats your ears? This process of over-compressing music has been occurring in such a gradual, insidious way that many industry professionals are unable to draw clear boundaries between music that is over-compressed and music that is not. One thing is for sure: when we turn music off because it is getting on our nerves, then it is probably because of a lack of dynamics. Unfortunately, strongly compressed music is also an unpleasant way of generating aggression. We who create music have a certain responsibility with regards to the rest of society.”
How did this phenomenon happen?
“The arrival of digital technology has made it technically possible for this process, thereby answering the commercial need of simply wanting to be heard. The principle is: ‘Whoever shouts the loudest will be heard.’ For labels and radio stations, loudness is the most important criterion in music. And that is where our work begins: We aim to provide qualified information so that people understand that loudness is not a measure of quality in music! There is a great lack of information in this area which has taken on huge proportions: most young people have never heard truly dynamic music played over a good-sounding hi-fi system. I believe that some of them would be so emotionally overwhelmed that they would cry with joy when hearing truly dynamic music under such conditions.”
What made you begin this wide-reaching initiative?
“As a mastering engineer I stand right in the crossfire between the detail-work of trying to obtain the best possible sound and the commercial pressures of my customers. Even when a customer knows that the sound suffers when dynamic range is further decreased, they accept this for fear of not being heard. This makes all my efforts involving working on fine nuances of sound practically obsolete. The only choice we are given is to make the loudest possible master with the least amount of sound-quality damage. Of course, that is not a satisfying way of working – all of the leading mastering engineers in the world agree here.”
“We therefore believe that our standard will increase the value of music. It is too simplistic to make the MP3 format out to be the scapegoat with regards to the current market situation in the entire music industry. The truth is more complex. The loss of emotional value in music is also a big part of this. We believe that our standard will strengthen the entire music industry. As soon as good-sounding music is once again purchased, musicians and all the creative people involved in making and producing music will profit.”

Artist funding platform Sellaband has been offline for several days with its front page declaring, “We’re currently down for maintenance…we expect to be back up tomorrow by the end of the day.”
But documents filed in an Amsterdam court yesterday show that the company has been declared insolvent, a Dutch legal status similar to bankruptcy in the U.S. An English translation of court documents reads simply:
The fate of funds being held for fan investors or for artists like Public Enemy, who were using the platform to raise funds for a new album or for fan investors is unclear. Company officials have not yet responded to an morning inquiry.
[via hypebot ]
EMI want to retain ownership of the iconic studios

The struggling record label EMI has issued a statement about the future of its Abbey Road recording studios in west London – saying it does not intend to sell the site.
After days of speculation about the fate of the iconic locale, the label released the statement saying it believes the studios should remain under its ownership.
Public outcry followed reports that it may sell Abbey Road, but the company now says it rejected an offer for the building last year and is in talks about a project to “revitalise” the studios which “would involve a substantial injection of new capital”.
EMI also said it welcomed reports that English Heritage planned to list Abbey Road, a step that would make it very hard for any developer to do anything radical to the site. A report in weekend paper The Times claim that the body’s chairwoman, Baroness Andrews, will confirm to culture minister Margaret Hodge next week they’ll stand by a previous recommendation that the studios be given Grade II listed status. It’s a move designed to stop them being turned into flats.
The trust also said that it had received unprecedented public support to step in and preserve the studios.
The campaign to save the save the site had been gathering momentum over the past week. A spokesperson for Andrew Lloyd Webber issued a statement saying that the musical theatre mogul would be ‘very interested in buying Abbey Road Studios.’
The studios were made famous by the likes of The Beatles, Pink Floyd, Maria Callas, Elgar and comedian Arthur Askey, with the zebra crossing at the front of the building is regularly used by tourists and music fans from across the world to recreate the iconic Beatles cover for their 1969 album Abbey Road.
Andrew Lloyd Webber’s spokesperson had said he was ”very interested in buying Abbey Road Studios.
“He first recorded there in 1967 with Tim Rice. Andrew has since recorded most of his musicals there, from Jesus Christ Superstar to his new musical Love Never Dies.”
“He thinks it is vital that the studios are saved for the future of the music industry in the UK.”
Spokesperson for Andrew Lloyd Webber
Fears were centred around the potential sale of the studios to property developers.
The National Trust had earlier expressed concern about protecting the site’s legacy. The charity said in a statement that “if there is enough momentum, we may launch a campaign to save the studios”.

Ever wonder what your website or blog would sound like as bad electronic music?
Now you can find out with CodeOrgan – an online service that generates music out of the content of Web pages.
CodeOrgan analyzes the text of pages and turns it into music using an algorithm that determines the key, synth style and drum pattern.
[via synthtopia ]
I don’t think it would be presumptuous of me to think that readers of this site probably spend quite a lot of time at gigs. Whether on stage or in the audience, musicians spend plenty of time in loud environments.

ETY-Plugs (TM) earplugs use patented technology that replicates the natural response of the ear canal so that sound heard with these earplugs is as clear as the original, just quieter. ETY-Plugs earplugs have nearly the same fidelity as Etymotic’s Musicians Earplugs (TM) (custom earplugs worn by professional musicians) and are a low cost alternative.
Hearing loss is a function of exposure time, the average sound level, and the peak level of very loud sounds. Exposure to excessive noise can cause permanent hearing loss depending on the intensity and duration of the sound.
Some persons are more susceptible to hearing loss from high-level sound than others. Protect your ears. In high-noise environments, wear Ety-Plugs. Includes one pair of Ety-Plugs, carrying case, black neck cord and instructions.
Getting Started: Techniques
Recording vocals can be simple or scientific. It depends on how much time you have to try different microphones, gear, or techniques if you’re in a recording studio on the clock, or in the privacy of your own home studio. Of course, you hope that the vocalist coming through the door knows how to “work” a microphone. For example, vocalists like Aretha Franklin, Stevie Wonder, Chaka Khan, and Gladys Knight will move in and away from a mic, depending on the intensity of thoughts they are singing. This technique provided us with incredible dynamics, and in most cases meant we did not have to heavily compress a vocal.
Next, the proximity of where the vocalist stood was key. When we did anything like doubling or background vocals, the proximity on one track may be closer than on another track, or if background vocalists were recorded together, the blend of the harmonies or levels were based on how close they stood to the mic. If you were loud, or if your harmony stood out, you had to stand back more. Back in the days of analog tape, you might have one chance to get it right. Some vocalist would come in ready to go, do one or two takes and that’s it. They barely would allow you to get a level.
Usually, the first take was the best take or it might have the most creative moments in it, so your levels needed to be close immediately. We couldn’t assume that we had plenty of warm up time, and punching in to fix a distorted vocal was embarrassing to say the least! The key was to make sure that you kept the dynamics of the vocal without overloading and distortion, to use a pop or wind screen, and having the mic at a good height and angle helped to eliminate plosives and kept you from having to de-ess later.
For the most part, there was no copying and pasting unless you transferred the information to another tape machine, then pressed Play at the right time to record it back to the multi-track. Later, in the ’80s, units with short sampling times came along which made that much easier.
We made sure that the vocalist had a good headphone mix to prevent any distractions. The right headphones were used to keep out as much headphone leakage as possible in the recording. The booth was usually dark or dim, in most cases to create the mood and allow the singer to see the music easier. This also kept them from feeling self conscious and gave them the ability to give an uninhibited performance. To see a room full of guests in the control room could sometimes be nerve wracking, so it helped to know that they couldn’t see you. The producers had to know the art of what to say to the vocalist over the talk-back and in the studio, between takes, to motivate them and guide them to the promised land of the perfect take.
Microphones
My first response was and still to this day is, “Use whatever you have that sounds the best!” Typically, if you stand in the vocal booth and listen to the vocalist, then go into the control room, it should sound close to what you heard in the vocal booth to maintain the natural color of the vocalist, unless you want to add warmth or a color via the mic, mic pre, or compressor. In other words, use a ribbon, dynamic, condenser, whatever works and fits the track. What good is a big fat vocal in a dance track if it’s not the main focus of the song, or a small vocal in a big lush ballad that calls for a big vocal because you did not choose the best mic?
Now with that being said, in the ’80s and early ’90s, I used Sanken, AKG 414 EB or C 12, and Neumann U 87 mics a lot. Sometimes we would use the Electro-Voice RE20 dynamic mic. We used to call it the “Stevie Wonder” mic. This mic allowed you to not have to worry about the typical proximity problems if you were working with either a soft singer or a strong singer who was close to the mic, the low end didn’t change like it would using the typical dynamic mic. We also used the Shure SM7 mic. We called that one the “Michael Jackson” mic. If the singer was one to snap their fingers, stomp their feet, et cetera, and we wanted to hear that, we might set the mic pattern to omni to record everything, and heavily baffle the area behind the mic so as not to pick up anything in that area.
Susie Akita, unknown, Brenda Richie, and Lionel Richie
Choosing a Compressor
Now that we’re recording into computers, those of you who aren’t sure can always record an extra track simultaneously without compression to be safe and not lock yourself or a mix engineer into an over-compressed vocal. UREI 1176, dbx 160 and 160X, Drawmer 1960, Teletronix LA-2As were used often. We would compress anywhere from 3:1 to 8:1, and only if needed and always using soft knee whenever available. Now that we’re in the age of recording digitally, it’s really important not to distort. In the days of analog, you could also hit a little bit of tape compression and that was okay too, but today some of those levels would sound nasty in the digital realm.
read the rest of the article By Dave Isaac on here
[via universal audio ]
| STS from Synchronia | |
| Synchronia, the small French audio company whose Sound Skulptor preamp kits we reviewed in September 2008, have just announced their Stereo Tape Simulator (or STS), which, as its name suggests, aims to impart some tape-style analogue warmth to single channels and stereo busses. An entirely analogue unit, the controls appear to be very intuitive, with just input and output level controls, a three-way tape-speed switch, and a hard-wired bypass switch for each channel. The channels are entirely independent of each other, so the unit can be used to process two different mono sources at different tape speeds and with different amounts of gain. There’s also comprehensive input metering so you can see how hard you’re driving the ‘tape’, and the output level control will then allow you to trim the level going back into your DAW or other digital recorder. The tape speeds available are 7.5, 15 and 30ips, and changing this setting alters the channel’s bandwidth and amount of saturation, so you can get exactly the type of tape effect you’re after. Furthermore, Synchronia say that typical tape-recorder electronics have been incorporated into the unit’s design, and these include pre-emphasis and de-emphasis stages, and record and playback amplifiers. There’s even a filter to emulate the high-frequency roll-off caused by the record-head gap. As with the Sound Skulptor preamps, the Stereo Tape Simulator is available as either a complete unit, or in kit form, with the DIY kit costing significantly less. Pre-assembled, the STS will set you back 899 Euros, with the kit costing 449 Euros. Both prices include VAT. |
|

Dizzee Rascal
BRITISH FEMALE SOLO ARTIST
Lily Allen
BRITISH BREAKTHROUGH ACT
JLS
BRITISH GROUP
Kasabian
BRITISH ALBUM
Florence And The Machine, Lungs
BRITISH SINGLE
Beat Again – JLS
Continue reading “Winners Of 2010 Brit Music Awards” on hypehot »














